---
title: UNISOLVE 0.16.1: One Solver Platform, 13 Problem Domains, Every Answer Checked | SpinForge
url: https://spin-forge.com/proof/s12
description: 106/106: CUDA gauntlet cases passed (one GH200). 106 CUDA Gauntlet Cases Passed on One GH200; 8 Real Application Models Answered and Checked; One Airline…
---

GARMO SOLVERS · S12

# UNISOLVE 0.16.1: One Solver Platform, 13 Problem Domains, Every Answer Checked

106 CUDA Gauntlet Cases Passed on One GH200; 8 Real Application Models Answered and Checked; One Airline Optimum Proved Exactly.

106/106 CUDA gauntlet cases passed (one GH200)

14,207 tests passed on Brev (13 skipped)

8/8 real application models answered and checked

gap 0 flugpl airline optimum 1,201,500 proved exactly

- Gauntlet: 106/106 passed; peak memory grows linearly (exponent 0.999–1.002)
- Real-world: 8/8 feasible and checked; 3 independently re-checked; flugpl 1,201,500 proved optimal (gap 0)
- Capacity case: 30 M vertices, 90 M edges, 4.2 GB peak
[Request the full poster by email](https://spin-forge.com/contact?product=portfolio&brief=Please%20send%20the%20full%20poster%3A%20UNISOLVE%200.16.1%3A%20One%20Solver%20Platform%2C%2013%20Problem%20Domains%2C%20Every%20Answer%20Checked%20%28S12%29.%0A%0AOur%20organization%20and%20intended%20use%3A%0A)

## More garmo solvers benchmark results

- [Proof-Carrying Max-Cut on a GH200: 67 Biq Mac Optima Proved vs HiGHS's 49](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s01)
- [Weighted MaxSAT on a GH200: From 14/33/50 to 33/38/26 Against NuWLS-c-IBR](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s02)
- [Large-Instance TSP on 16 Arm Cores: 0.692 %  0.165 % Mean Gap, Still Behind LKH-3](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s03)
- [A Native QCDCL Solver vs DepQBF: From 0 vs 4 to a 15–15 Tie, Then 15 vs 18 on Fresh Instances](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s04)
- [Vehicle Routing vs PyVRP: a C++ Solver Wins 37/26/21 at Equal Budget](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s05)
- [ISPD98 Bisection: Our Partitioner Beats KaHyPar and mt-KaHyPar at Equal Budget](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s06)
- [An Evidence-Driven Solver Router: Regret 0.046 vs 0.190 for the Best Single Backend](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s07)
- [A Verified MIP Race: HiGHS, SCIP and GPU Primal Heuristics Against cuOpt on MIPLIB 2017](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s08)
- [Constraint Programming in C++: 39 of 40 Schedules Proved Optimal vs CP-SAT's 20](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s09)
- [Certified GPU Numerics: Every Answer Carries a Checkable Certificate: and Where It Costs](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s10)
- [LABS on a GH200: Exponent 1.24 to the Proven Optimum, Beside the QAOA Exponents](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s11)
- [Four Certified Builds: Toroidal Proofs, Unroutability Certificates, CertBQP and a 235× Batch Service](https://spin-forge.com/proof/s13)

[All results, charts and papers](https://spin-forge.com/proof)

Results describe the stated inputs, hardware and conditions and are not a guarantee of results in your environment. See the [Terms of Use](https://spin-forge.com/terms).