Executable decision models
Turn business rules, objectives and approved data into a reusable decision model your team can inspect and run.
Customer-specific engineering
Selected product access: CLI · MCP · Headless
Operations owners, planning-software teams and engineering groups with a valuable decision but no agreed executable model.
Agree the business requirement, model and outcome before choosing the implementation.
Capacity, deadlines and priorities can mean different things to different people.
We define the units, data mappings, decision variables and objective with the customer, then connect that approved specification to a supported model.
An attractive score can hide a requirement that was never represented correctly.
Separate non-negotiable requirements from authorized trade-offs. Record customer-approved positive, negative and boundary examples before acceptance.
One-off spreadsheets and undocumented assumptions make the decision difficult to repeat.
Deliver a versioned model, input contract and repeatable invocation path, with ownership of future model changes made explicit.
The written scope names the inputs, implementation, evidence and handover your team receives.
Definitions, units, objectives, mandatory constraints and permitted preferences, reviewed by the customer.
The supported representation and data adapter selected for the workflow, with its original-source relationship retained.
Approved valid, invalid and boundary cases that test the interpretation as well as the returned result.
Invocation, revision, evidence and review instructions for the agreed environment.
A production planner wants to allocate work subject to machines, qualified operators and due dates. The engagement defines what each limit means before an optimizer is asked to choose. Illustrative, not a customer case study.
Illustration of the engagement, not a live solver or a customer case study.
Identify the decision, units, rules, objectives, source data and who can approve changes.
The following inputs and measures guide the proposal and acceptance plan.
Select only what the task needs.
These links do not assert a completed combined integration.
Commission a bounded scope using the existing engineering and licensing options. A $15,000 workload assessment or $30,000 focused sprint may fit a limited first step; neither includes the entire workflow by default. Larger implementation, operated delivery, compute and continuing rights are agreed separately.
This is a customer-specific engagement using selected existing products. The model, adapters, user experience and acceptance work are scoped before delivery. It does not add another underlying product or establish a completed integration.
Yes, where its input, output and operating interfaces fit the agreed scope. A custom adapter may be required. The existing tools do not have to be replaced to qualify one useful component.
Agree the baseline, required result, explicit limits, delivery capacity and acceptance tests before work begins. Existing software rates remain unchanged; engineering already included in a larger scope is not charged twice.
One capability. A connected workflow.
A team to put it into practice.