Propose a useful integer representation
LatForge can propose lattice-basis changes for compatible subproblems. This is a possible contribution to integer optimization, not just cryptographic analysis.
S5 / SYSTEM CONNECTIONExplore all 64 product roles
Different coordinates.
The same original question.
Sometimes the valuable change is not a faster search step. It is a representation that exposes useful structure. A lattice tool, an exact algebraic operation or a checked graph transformation may contribute outside its usual product category.
Cross-product integration / customer qualificationExisting products · CLI · MCP · Headless
The products retain their available interfaces. These connections describe integration and evaluation opportunities—not a claim that every combined runtime has been delivered.
Choose the mathematical bridge for the source.
Router is now explicitly the Garmo Solvers backend-selection/racing/guard module. UNISOLVE retains its separate source-preserving dispatch and proof-transport mechanisms. The right owner of a coordinated computation is defined per workflow.
Explore the eleven products ↗THE CUSTOMER CHALLENGEWhat separate
What separate
tools can miss.
A source model can hide structure or force an inconvenient search representation. A seemingly simpler reformulation is useless if it changes the feasible decisions or loses the original objective.
THE COMBINED APPROACH TO EVALUATEConnect the
Connect the
right responsibilities.
Evaluate an admitted transformation, preserve the original-source relationship and independently check the lifted result. Existing graph-to-MIP transport and checked symmetry reductions provide concrete source-backed examples; an integer-lattice bridge is additional integration work.
A potentially more useful computational path without asking the customer to accept an answer to a different problem.
HOW THE PRODUCTS RELATEThe useful
The useful
intersection.
Existing components have distinct jobs. The proposed integration connects their responsibilities without treating access interfaces as proof of a shared runtime.
Support exact checking
modalg can assist admitted exact algebraic checks and reconstruction. It is not automatically an implementation of every required integer normal form.
Search the admitted reformulation
UCS, UNISOLVE and relevant MIP/binary engines retain their model limits. GarmoForge can coordinate a supported formulation choice.
Return to the original question
The final candidate, objective and claimed proof must be checked against the original source and the actual transformation contract.
INTERACTIVE STUDY / NOT A PRODUCT BENCHMARK
See the connection.
A local browser illustration of the idea. No customer model is uploaded and no SpinForge engine is invoked.
This guide describes acceptance obligations. It does not generate an integer parametrization or run LatForge, modalg or a proof checker. Equal determinants alone are insufficient evidence of lattice equality.
WHAT YOU COMMISSIONAn evaluation.
An evaluation.
A defined delivery.
Not another mandatory product license. Scope the model, integration, acceptance and deployment needed for the actual customer workload.
A source-preserving transformation scope
Specify which inputs and relationships the chosen transformation admits.
Explicit relationship evidence
State why the reduced/reformulated model retains the necessary feasible choices and objective meaning.
A lifted, checked result
Map the candidate and applicable evidence back to the original problem.
A total-cost comparison
Include transformation and replay work, not just the reduced search size.
ILLUSTRATIVE CUSTOMER WORKFLOW
An integer model with an awkward representation
An engineering team evaluates whether an admitted coordinate or structural change improves the actual solve-and-check path. Reject the transformation if preservation is unestablished or the full workload becomes worse.
ACCEPTANCE MEASURES
- Original-source preservation
- Candidate feasibility and objective consistency
- Total import / transformation / solve / check cost
- Behavior on unmatched structure
SCOPE & EVIDENCEClear at
Clear at
every boundary.
Documented components and proposed cross-product work are not the same evidence.
What the source supports
The latest UNISOLVE inventory documents graph-to-MIP transport and symmetry-to-count reduction. Its K20 diagnostic has 21 count valuations versus 1,048,576 Boolean assignments and verified optimum 100. These are example-specific facts, not general throughput claims.
The integration to establish
Complete integer parametrizations where needed, exact transformation witnesses, lifting contracts and matched end-to-end tests.
What must not be assumed
Equal determinants alone do not establish lattice equality. LLL reduction is not a complete integer parametrization. A smaller state count is not a runtime multiplier, and no general improvement is implied for unrelated instances.
Products remain independently usable
Choose only the components that fit. Original and upgrade products are not additive speedups. No generalized benefit, hosted activation, certification or execution authority is implied.
SELECTED CAPABILITIESFind the
Find the
product role.
These links identify candidate contributors. They do not mean every product is required or that every connector already exists.
TAKE THE IDEA TO YOUR WORKLOADDefine what
Define what
must improve.
Start with an original model or workload, an accepted baseline and the protected requirements. Agree the comparison before promising a system-level gain.