Produce candidate decisions
SpinForge and compatible cut, binary, MIP, MaxSAT, scheduling or routing engines supply candidate plans under their own model contracts.
S4 / SYSTEM CONNECTIONExplore all 64 product roles
A good decision.
More room for what follows.
Two decisions can have nearly the same immediate cost yet leave very different recovery options. Where future flexibility is part of the agreed objective, compare materially different responses under explicitly modeled scenarios.
Cross-product integration / customer qualificationExisting products · CLI · MCP · Headless
The products retain their available interfaces. These connections describe integration and evaluation opportunities—not a claim that every combined runtime has been delivered.
Overlap Lab studies the answer landscape.
The existing research implementation measures spin-glass overlap structure, not merely the score. Connecting that analysis to useful candidate panels or recourse requires a domain-specific diversity and acceptance definition.
Explore the eleven products ↗THE CUSTOMER CHALLENGEWhat separate
What separate
tools can miss.
The cheapest present plan can commit every scarce resource. A large collection of nominal alternatives may still fail under the same future event, or contain many equivalent copies of the same real choice.
THE COMBINED APPROACH TO EVALUATEConnect the
Connect the
right responsibilities.
Combine appropriate candidate search, admitted counting or distribution analysis, and bounded sequential or quantified planning. Assess distinct useful responses, not the raw number of solver outputs.
An explicit view of the trade-off between immediate performance and permitted future flexibility.
HOW THE PRODUCTS RELATEThe useful
The useful
intersection.
Existing components have distinct jobs. The proposed integration connects their responsibilities without treating access interfaces as proof of a shared runtime.
Characterize alternatives
certcount and certnum: log-Z concern supported partition quantities; exact counting concerns admitted discrete models. Neither is a universal sampler or robustness guarantee.
Evaluate future responses
ValueForge/certnum: MDP address modeled probabilistic transitions. UNISOLVE QBF addresses certain quantified choices while preserving decision and observation order.
Compare distributions where useful
sinkhorn_ot or CertOT can contribute admitted transport comparisons. Marginal checks do not establish that the real-world distribution was modeled correctly.
INTERACTIVE STUDY / NOT A PRODUCT BENCHMARK
See the connection.
A local browser illustration of the idea. No customer model is uploaded and no SpinForge engine is invoked.
A conceptual comparison of decision criteria, not an executed scenario study. The customer must approve the actual future events, probabilities or worst-case criterion, protected requirements and permitted recourse.
WHAT YOU COMMISSIONAn evaluation.
An evaluation.
A defined delivery.
Not another mandatory product license. Scope the model, integration, acceptance and deployment needed for the actual customer workload.
A customer-approved scenario set
Define relevant future events, action timing and permissible recovery choices.
Distinct candidate alternatives
Identify equivalent choices and evaluate genuinely different options.
An explicit trade-off report
Compare immediate objectives with the agreed scenario or recourse measure.
Scoped strategy evidence
Return the applicable value, counting, constraint or strategy checks and unresolved outcomes.
ILLUSTRATIVE CUSTOMER WORKFLOW
A constrained operating plan facing a disruption
Compare a low-cost plan that uses all available capacity with a permitted alternative that reserves a recovery path. Flexibility only counts when its scenarios, probability or worst-case criterion are explicit.
ACCEPTANCE MEASURES
- Immediate objective and feasibility
- Scenario-specific recovery feasibility
- Distinct useful alternatives
- Full cost of generating and checking options
SCOPE & EVIDENCEClear at
Clear at
every boundary.
Documented components and proposed cross-product work are not the same evidence.
What the source supports
Candidate, counting, transport, MDP and quantified-game capabilities are documented separately. The option-preserving customer workflow is proposed and needs its own application validation.
The integration to establish
Scenario models, equivalence/diversity rules, sequential decision semantics and supported candidate-to-planner interfaces.
What must not be assumed
More assignments do not automatically mean greater resilience. Symmetry duplicates must not inflate useful diversity. Exact counting may cost more than optimization. A bounded quantified strategy is not a complete physical controller or an unrestricted future guarantee.
Products remain independently usable
Choose only the components that fit. Original and upgrade products are not additive speedups. No generalized benefit, hosted activation, certification or execution authority is implied.
SELECTED CAPABILITIESFind the
Find the
product role.
These links identify candidate contributors. They do not mean every product is required or that every connector already exists.
TAKE THE IDEA TO YOUR WORKLOADDefine what
Define what
must improve.
Start with an original model or workload, an accepted baseline and the protected requirements. Agree the comparison before promising a system-level gain.